Choosing Your Path to Wealth
I keep meeting well‑settled professionals itching to quit and start up. A friend just raised a round. A neighbor had a life‑changing exit. Another made a fortune from full‑time investing. These stories are powerful triggers, but they’re tilted by hidden survivorship bias.
So I decided to compare the different paths to wealth — jobs, entrepreneurship, investing, trading — to reveal their actual risks and returns.
The Nature of Risk
We first list the different paths and rank them on their success rate, returns, effort and capital required.
Click to sort | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The True Picture
Raw returns tell only half the story. The fuller picture comes from risk‑adjusted comparisons — how much outcome you get per unit of risk. Here, I use a simple model to compute three relative metrics for each path: total risk, expected value (EV), and risk‑adjusted return (Sharpe ratio). These scores are relative, not absolute.
When expected value (EV) and total risk are plotted, patterns emerge. Total risk sits on the x‑axis, expected returns on the y‑axis, and the bubble size denotes risk‑adjusted return — how much return you earn per unit of risk. Larger bubbles indicate a better risk‑reward payoff.
Conclusions & Actions
Job: Low Risk, Reliable Payoff
The steady paycheck may look boring, but its predictability is most powerful — especially when you channel the savings into broad index funds or PPF over decades. For most people, this combo dominates on a risk‑adjusted basis, and crucially, the downside is bounded—setbacks are recoverable; there are no blow‑ups.
Entrepreneurship: High Upside, Low Success Rates
Startups offer the biggest potential outcomes and the highest failure rates. Visible winners are the exception, not the rule. It’s a very satisfying path if you have passion and an edge —certainly not as a guaranteed wealth-creation strategy.
Angel Investing: Passion Activity, Windfall Unlikely
If you love working with founders and products, angel investing can be very rewarding. But as a wealth strategy, the base rates are harsh — most angels and VC funds underperform simple index funds.
Index & Long‑Term Investing: Dependable Compounding
Broad, low‑cost index funds and patient diversification score well on both EV and risk‑adjusted return — particularly when funded by regular savings, windfall or inherited capital.
Day trading & F&O: Poor Odds
Leverage, costs, and base‑rate failure make this the worst path on a risk‑adjusted basis. Most traders lose money.
Member discussion